Difference between Datagram Switching & Virtual Circuit

1. Datagram switching :

Datagram packet switching is a packet switching method that treats each packet, or datagram, as a separate entity. Each packet is routed via the network on its own. It is a service that does not require a connection. Because there is no specific channel for a connection session, there is no need to reserve resources. As a result, packets have a header with all the destination’s information. The intermediate nodes assess a packet’s header and select an appropriate link to a different node closer to the destination.

Advantages of Datagram Switching:

• Scalability: Datagram switching is highly scalable and can handle large amounts of traffic on a network.
• Flexibility: Datagram switching is flexible and can support variable packet sizes and data rates.
• Simple routing: Datagram switching does not require a pre-established path for each packet, allowing packets to be routed dynamically.
• Lower latency: Datagram switching typically has lower latency than virtual circuit switching, as packets are sent immediately without any delay for setup.

Disadvantages of Datagram Switching:

• Higher error rates: Datagram switching is more susceptible to errors than virtual circuit switching, as there is no guaranteed delivery or error correction.
• Lack of QoS: Datagram switching does not provide any Quality of Service guarantees, meaning that different types of traffic may be treated equally.
• Increased network congestion: Without a pre-established path for each packet, datagram switching can lead to increased network congestion and potential delays.

2. Virtual Circuit :

Virtual packet switching approach in which a path is built between the source and the final destination through which all packets are routed throughout a call is known as virtual circuit switching. Because the connection looks to the user to be an infatuated physical circuit, this path is referred to as a virtual circuit. Other communications, on the other hand, may be sharing parts of the same path. Before the data transmission can commence, the source and destination must agree on a virtual circuit path. For the decision, all intermediary nodes between the two places add a routing entry to their routing database. Additional parameters, like the utmost packet size, also are exchanged between the source and therefore the destination during call setup. The virtual circuit is cleared after the info transfer is completed.

Advantages of Virtual Circuit Switching:

• Guaranteed delivery: Virtual circuit switching provides guaranteed delivery of packets, reducing the likelihood of lost or corrupted data.
• Lower error rates: Virtual circuit switching typically has lower error rates than datagram switching due to its error correction mechanisms.
• QoS support: Virtual circuit switching supports Quality of Service guarantees, allowing for prioritization of different types of traffic.
• Efficient use of bandwidth: Virtual circuit switching establishes a pre-determined path for each packet, resulting in efficient use of bandwidth.

Disadvantages of Virtual Circuit Switching:

• Limited scalability: Virtual circuit switching is less scalable than datagram switching and may not be suitable for large networks.
• Increased setup time: Virtual circuit switching requires a setup time for each connection, which can lead to increased latency and delay.
• Fixed data rates: Virtual circuit switching typically supports fixed data rates, which may not be suitable for applications that require variable packet sizes or data rates.

Some similarities between them:

• Both are packet-switching technologies: Datagram switching and virtual circuit switching are both packet-switching technologies, which means that they break up data into small packets for transmission across a network.
• Both can handle multiple transmissions simultaneously: Both Datagram and virtual circuit switching can handle multiple transmissions simultaneously by dividing data into packets and transmitting them separately.
• Both use connection-oriented and connectionless communication: Virtual circuit switching can use both connection-oriented and connectionless communication, while Datagram switching typically uses connectionless communication. However, both techniques can support both types of communication.
• Both support error correction: Both Datagram and virtual circuit switching support error correction by using checksums or parity checks to ensure the accuracy of transmitted data.
• Both can handle variable-length packets: Datagram and virtual circuit switching can handle variable-length packets, which means that they can adjust to the size of the data being transmitted.
• Both can support QoS (Quality of Service): Both Datagram and virtual circuit switching can support QoS, which allows for the prioritization of certain types of data over others.
• Both can support fragmentation: Both Datagram and virtual circuit switching can support fragmentation, which allows for large data packets to be broken up into smaller packets for transmission across a network.

Difference between Datagram switching & Virtual circuit switching :